A critical and important factor for the successful treatment of burns is the early covering of the burned area with a skin substitute. Covering burns requires materials that restore epidermal function and integrate with the healing process. Biological dressings are the gold standard for temporary burn coverage. All biological skin substitutes are susceptible to early graft reactions, the only exception being amniotic membrane. The importance of the amniotic membrane as a biological link in burn injuries is: It is a barrier against bacterial colonization, promotes epithelialization and controls water loss. Amnioplasty is a method of applying an amniotic membrane to the recipient site. This comparative study included 60 patients with cutaneous and subcutaneous burns. A study was conducted in a study cohort of 30 amnionoplasty burn patients, using amniotic membranes preserved in 76% alcohol. The control group consisted of her 30 patients who had conventionally treated burns using standard methods of topical burn treatment. Initial excision with exposure, occlusive dressing, and skin graft. Histopathological and microbiological analyzes of biopsies were performed. The extent of burn injury was determined by histopathological analysis of biopsies taken on day 3, and further reepithelialization was clinically observed in some subjects who had reepithelialization on day 7. Histological analysis of biopsies not only specifically determines the extent of burn injury, but also facilitates the selection of further treatment methods, observes the rate of re-epithelialization, and enables accurate diagnosis and early initiation of specific treatment. It plays an important role in initiation. Using the amniotic membrane as a biological dressing promotes re-epithelialization and prevents invasive bacterial infections. It is recommended that histopathologic examination of burns be established as a standard practice in clinical practice. This review aims to provide a balanced view of the role of surgical resection and burn closure in the larger context of holistic care and rehabilitation of burn patients. The historical background that led to today's practice is outlined. We discuss the salient technical and logistical challenges associated with performing debridement, with an emphasis on the need to rapidly complete these procedures with significant blood loss. A realistic analysis of the outcome of ablative therapy in patients with varying degrees of burns is presented. As the size of deep burns exceeds her 20% of total body surface area, it becomes increasingly difficult to identify benefits attributable to the surgical phase of treatment. Cover the burn with cling film. Place the adhesive film over the burn rather than wrapping it around the limb. For hand burns, you can use a clean, clear plastic bag. After performing these steps, you should determine if further treatment is needed. Large burns larger than the affected person's hand Deep burns of any size that cause white or charred skin Burns to the face, neck, hands, feet, joints, or genitals All chemical and electrical burns Other injuries requiring medical attention. All of these so-called home remedies can actually make the injury worse. For results more serious than superficial burns, or if redness and pain persist for more than a few hours, see your doctor. All electrical burns and burns to the hands, mouth, or genitals require immediate medical attention. Burn-causing chemicals can also be absorbed through the skin and cause other symptoms. After washing off the chemicals,